Absurdity of Absurd Samuel Beckett s Waiting for Go dot
Below is a MRR and PLR article in category Writing Speaking -> subcategory Other.
Absurdity of the Absurd: Samuel Beckett's "Waiting for Godot"
Introduction
The concept of the "absurd" can be perplexing. When I looked it up, I found it described as being "out of harmony." Yet, definitions that attempt to clarify it often end in paradox, highlighting the very absurdity they aim to explain. In literature and art, understanding the absurd often requires engaging with the work itself, rather than relying solely on definitions or criticism.
As a literary student, the play that exemplifies the absurd for me is Samuel Beckett’s "Waiting for Godot." This so-called absurd play revolves around Godot?"an enigma, as no one can definitively say who or what Godot is.
Context and Background
One particularly memorable performance of "Waiting for Godot" took place on November 19, 1957. The San Francisco Actors Workshop presented it at San Quentin penitentiary, marking the first live play performed there since 1913. This event underscores the play's unique appeal and Beckett's triumph, considering its first production in 1953 at the Théâtre de Babylone.
A Glimpse at the Play
The dialogue between Estragon and Vladimir captures the essence of the play:
- Estragon: "Didi."
- Vladimir: "Yes."
- Estragon: "I can't go on like this."
- Vladimir: "That's what you think."
- Estragon: "If we parted? That might be better for us."
- Vladimir: "We'll hang ourselves tomorrow. (Pause) Unless Godot comes."
- Estragon: "And if he comes?"
- Vladimir: "We'll be saved."
Beckett once remarked that if he knew who Godot was, he would have said so in the play. "Waiting for Godot" does not tell a traditional story but rather portrays a static situation. Beckett crafted a character without character, and a plot with minimal action, illustrating his departure from conventional narrative structures.
Understanding the Absurd
The term "absurd" is not limited to the play's structural elements. Ionesco defined the absurd as something devoid of purpose. This is evident in the play's cyclical nature, where despite change, everything remains the same. For example, the boy delivering Godot's messages fails to recognize Estragon and Vladimir, even though he encounters them repeatedly?"a demonstration of purposelessness.
Martin Esslin interprets waiting as experiencing time and change, yet in the play, change is an illusion. The ceaseless activity of time represents self-defeating purposelessness.
The Contradictions within Absurdity
Is the play truly absurd? Truth and normalcy are subjective. We perceive absurdity by comparing it to our understanding of what's normal. For instance, Rene Wellek, in discussing Beckett's "Endgame," highlights the challenge of expressing dissatisfaction through language?"a medium that's itself a product of human intellect.
Absurdity and normality are interdependent. In "Waiting for Godot," Beckett explores absurdity through abnormal actions, yet elements of normalcy and logic persist. The boy's interactions with the tramps hint at a hidden structure. Multiple interpretations arise: perhaps Godot waits for the tramps, not the other way around.
Absurdity in Art and Culture
The play's impact on the convicts at San Quentin?"who lacked preconceived notions and expectations?"offers insight into how audiences can connect with the abstract. Martin Esslin suggests that the prisoners, by avoiding traditional critiques, encountered its essence more directly.
Efforts to expand art's boundaries can be seen in movements like Dadaism. These attempts blur lines between art and non-art: using machine noises in music, incorporating everyday objects in visual art, and creating literature through randomness.
Similarly, pop culture, once deemed absurd, is now mainstream. Beckett's play continues to challenge our perceptions, as it balances between the absurd and the familiar.
Conclusion
Ultimately, absurdity and expression require contrast, much like silence and music. While we strive to depict absurdity, our means to express it?"language?"cannot perfectly capture it. As Roland Barthes noted, literature is filled with deceptive signification, endlessly suggesting without ever fully expressing.
In exploring Beckett's work, we confront our own understanding of absurdity. Whether we find sense or nonsense, our exploration is an attempt to comprehend the inexplicable.
Thus, the absurd engages us not just through its ambiguity but through its challenge to our perceptions, inviting us to reflect on the boundaries of reason and creativity.
You can find the original non-AI version of this article here: Absurdity of Absurd Samuel Beckett s Waiting for Go dot.
You can browse and read all the articles for free. If you want to use them and get PLR and MRR rights, you need to buy the pack. Learn more about this pack of over 100 000 MRR and PLR articles.