ICANN Creating a Monopoly in Domain Names
Below is a MRR and PLR article in category Internet Business -> subcategory Domains.
ICANN's Potential Monopoly in Domain Names
Summary
If ICANN were to open the top-level domain (TLD) market to companies with the necessary technical and financial capabilities, we could see more options such as apple.computer, apple.music, or apple.printer. New TLDs like .lyr, .atty, or .cpa could emerge, reducing trademark conflicts.Article Body
In the early days of the Internet, obtaining a domain name was as simple as calling Jon Postel and requesting one. However, as the Internet gained popularity, the competition for desirable, short domain names, especially in the .com space, intensified. Now, securing a compelling domain often means settling for longer, sometimes less memorable names.
ICANN (Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers) introduces new TLDs in rounds, often opting for generic options like .info or .biz, which can lead to trademark issues. For example, both Apple Records and Apple Computers hold valid trademarks for the name "Apple." So, who should rightfully claim apple.com or apple.biz? And if a new business, like Apple Printing Services, trademarks "Apple" for its own use, shouldn't it also have equal rights to these domains?
Opening up the TLD market could resolve such conflicts by allowing businesses with the technical and financial resources to create their own TLDs. Options like apple.computer, apple.music, or apple.printer could become available. New domain extensions like .lyr, .atty, or .cpa could flourish, mitigating trademark disputes.
Historically, domain names were allocated on a first-come, first-served basis, which was practical when there was less congestion. However, to ensure future generations and new businesses have access to desirable domains, we need to expand TLD options. Contrary to ICANN's claims, there is substantial unmet demand for new TLDs.
Restricting TLD availability allows a few companies to monopolize short, desirable domain names, while others must settle for longer alternatives. This creates an unfair advantage for established businesses over new ones.
As cities expand to accommodate growth, so should the domain namespace. Limiting TLD expansion is akin to forcing new businesses to operate on upper floors while competitors occupy prime ground-floor locations.
Cities that support business growth by providing opportunities, such as premium locations and incentives, thrive economically. Hence, expanding TLD space is crucial to foster similar opportunities online.
Imagine if cities restricted new businesses to building on top of existing structures, forcing customers to navigate through competitors' premises first. This analogy illustrates the challenge faced by new businesses unable to secure a short domain, like design.com, having to settle for alternatives like webdesign.com or even longer, less appealing names.
Having a business name as your domain isn’t always enough. Many businesses share names, and generic keywords in domains provide an edge since consumers search for products or services rather than specific businesses.
ICANN's limitations on new TLD creation put new businesses and Internet users at a disadvantage, preventing them from securing memorable domain names. This practice stifles free trade and may infringe on anti-monopoly laws by restricting competition in the domain name industry.
You can find the original non-AI version of this article here: ICANN Creating a Monopoly in Domain Names.
You can browse and read all the articles for free. If you want to use them and get PLR and MRR rights, you need to buy the pack. Learn more about this pack of over 100 000 MRR and PLR articles.