Abortion and the Right to Life
Below is a MRR and PLR article in category Health Fitness -> subcategory Women s Issues.
Abortion and the Right to Life
Introduction
The topic of abortion is often charged with emotion, leading to arguments that may lack depth and clarity. Questions such as "Is abortion immoral?" and "Is abortion murder?" are frequently conflated.
Abortion and the Social Contract
Abortion debates often use language reserved for natural disasters. Sometimes, embryos are likened to invaders or diseases, but unlike cancer, pregnancy is generally preceded by a voluntary act. When a woman consents to unprotected sex and becomes pregnant, it's argued she enters into a "contract" with the fetus, assuming certain responsibilities.
However, a contract requires free will. If fulfilling it endangers life, the assumption of a rational agreement falls apart?"no rational person consents to a contract that poses such risks.
Judith Jarvis Thomson, in "A Defence of Abortion," argued that pregnancies resulting from rape or those risking the mother's life could morally be terminated, as these situations do not constitute a willing agreement.
Similarly, if a woman uses contraception yet still becomes pregnant, it's akin to expressing an unwillingness to enter a contract, and thus, such a contract could be considered void.
The embryo complicates this contract, lacking consciousness or the capacity for intent. Therefore, can it be a valid party to a contract? Society often stands in for those unable to advocate for themselves, like minors or the mentally disabled, favoring the protection of potential life.
The Mother's and Fetus's Rights
Contracts specify the rights of the involved parties. There is no debate about the mother being a rights-holder. But what about the embryo? Some argue it gains rights under certain conditions. Others say life itself is the basis for rights. Don Marquis suggests the wrongness of terminating life lies in depriving a future filled with potential.
However, making this a conflict between mother and child is unnecessary. Contracts reflect compromises, a balance rather than maximization of rights. By becoming pregnant (willingly or by taking risks), a mother is seen as entering an implicit contract with the fetus.
Legal (and moral) principles hold that no contract can be annulled unilaterally, but contracts can be voided if entered under duress, without consent, or through failed preventive measures. Thus, situations like rape or contraception failure would justify termination on contractual grounds.
Moral and Legal Implications
Viewing abortion as murder raises philosophical challenges. If abortion is a crime against potential, so should the destruction of sperm or eggs, which hold equal potential.
Some faiths indeed equate contraception and masturbation with murder because they prevent potential life. But if abortion were truly murder, laws would penalize it more severely.
Appendix: The Right to Life
1. Right to Be Born: A fetus resulting from intentional conception may have rights to birth.
2. Right to Life Maintenance: A fetus does not hold a right to sustain its life solely at the mother's expense, except through societal obligation.
3. Right Not to Be Killed: This includes protecting the unborn from harm, but clashes arise when rights threaten others.
4. Right to Have Life Saved: Not legally enforceable, differing from morally commendable actions.
Conclusion
The discussion surrounding abortion is complex, involving ethical, legal, and philosophical dimensions. It’s essential to consider both the rights and responsibilities of all parties involved, fostering a more nuanced understanding of a deeply personal and societal issue.
You can find the original non-AI version of this article here: Abortion and the Right to Life.
You can browse and read all the articles for free. If you want to use them and get PLR and MRR rights, you need to buy the pack. Learn more about this pack of over 100 000 MRR and PLR articles.