The Myth of the Earnings Yield
Below is a MRR and PLR article in category Finance -> subcategory Stock Market.
The Myth of the Earnings Yield
Summary:
Throughout much of the 20th century, American novels often depicted characters using dividends from their stock holdings to pay for college or secure loans. However, by the 1950s, the popularity of dividends began to wane due to unfavorable tax treatments and other factors. This shift significantly impacted financial theories and stock valuation methods developed in that era, many of which remain in use today.Article Body:
In the mid-20th century, American novels frequently showcased characters who relied on dividends from their stocks to fund their children's education or use as collateral. But over time, dividends faded from the financial landscape, becoming as rare as hula hoops on playgrounds. Today, the majority of companies either pay inconsistent dividends or none at all, partly due to the unfavorable tax implications associated with distributed profits.
This decline in dividends has sparked a financial revolution, altering the foundational theories used to value stocks in the 1950s and 1960s. Back then, when dividends were common, these theories were built on assumptions such as:
- The fair value of a share closely mirroring its market price.
- Price movements being random yet connected to the share's fair value, eventually aligning over time.
- The fair value rapidly reflecting new information about a company, as proposed by the strong-form efficiency market hypothesis.
But how do we determine fair value when dividends are scarce? Typically, we apply a discount rate to future income streams, like dividends. However, with dividends dwindling, analysts now rely on "expected" dividends rather than actual ones.
To approximate expected dividends, net earnings are often used. Higher earnings suggest a greater likelihood of future dividends. This reasoning led to the perception that retained earnings?"often used by managers?"might act as deferred dividends. Reinvested retained earnings presumably generate more income, increasing the chance of future dividends. Undistributed earnings thus provide a "yield," misleadingly termed as an "earnings yield." This is a departure from the traditional meaning of "yield," which refers to actual income for an investor.
Why does the concept of "earnings yield" persist? Financial theories suggest that without dividends, shares hold no value. An investor's holdings gain worth through the income they generate; no income, no value. Of course, investors can sell shares for capital gains, but these gains?"typically driven by earnings expectations?"aren’t usually part of stock valuation models.
To address the scarcity of dividends, market participants, especially on Wall Street, shifted focus to future dividends arising from accumulated and reinvested capital. Thus, the myth of the earnings yield was born, highlighting a stark contrast between financial theories and practical market realities.
Investors today rarely buy shares expecting a reliable income stream through dividends. Instead, their focus is on potential capital gains, betting on the possibility of selling shares later at an increased price. While previous generations valued income from dividends, modern investors prioritize capital gains as the primary driver of market prices.
Why do share prices fluctuate, if not for dividends? Prices often hinge on market sentiment, available buyers, and new information, including earnings reports. A rational investor factors in expected earnings and market volatility, which indicates potential buyer availability at various price points. But if earnings aren’t distributed as dividends, why do they impact share prices and capital gains?
Earnings act as a crucial benchmark, indirectly affecting market price and potential capital gains. The anticipated increase in share value often correlates with expected income streams to the firm. Even if higher earnings don't directly boost dividends, they predict the firm's future value and potential capital gains. This is why earnings figures captivate investors: while not directly translating into dividends, they are indicators of a firm’s worth and potential for capital appreciation.
The shift from deriving future income from shares to focusing on a stock's potential value reflects a move towards inefficiency in markets. While efficient markets swiftly incorporate new information, inefficient ones grapple with uncertain buyer availability at different prices.
Markets once driven by dividend income react predictably to information, distributing gains and losses evenly over time around a fair value. In contrast, capital gains-driven markets resemble pyramid schemes, reliant on new investor capital to sustain valuations. However, once this capital influx dwindles, the market collapses, leading to what’s known as an "asset bubble."
Current investment models, like the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM), may falter in this climate. As stocks and markets synchronize due to the influence of potential future buyers, diversification may lose its effectiveness. Until market models incorporate "expected liquidity" considerations, they risk becoming obsolete.
You can find the original non-AI version of this article here: The Myth of the Earnings Yield.
You can browse and read all the articles for free. If you want to use them and get PLR and MRR rights, you need to buy the pack. Learn more about this pack of over 100 000 MRR and PLR articles.