The Business of Torture
Below is a MRR and PLR article in category Business -> subcategory Ethics.
The Business of Torture
Introduction
As global awareness of human rights has grown, the definition of these rights has broadened. At the same time, some authoritarian regimes continue to resort to repression and torture. In response, human rights advocates and non-governmental organizations have proliferated, creating a complex industry that includes lawyers, therapists, consultants, and scholars offering various services and expertise.
Human Rights Cases and Legal Actions
On January 16, 2003, the European Court of Human Rights agreed to hear six cases filed by Chechens against Russia, accusing the Russian military of torture and indiscriminate killings. The Court has previously ruled against the Russian Federation, awarding thousands of euros in compensation to plaintiffs.
In June 2001, the International Labor Rights Fund filed a lawsuit against ExxonMobile, alleging the company was complicit in human rights abuses in Aceh, Indonesia. Similarly, in November 2002, a coalition of law firms filed a complaint against businesses for aiding the apartheid regime in South Africa, accusing them of supporting forced labor, torture, and other abuses.
Accusations have also been leveled against Unocal in Myanmar and other multinationals. In September 2002, a class action was filed against Royal Dutch Petroleum and Shell Transport for allegedly supporting operations that terrorized civilians in Nigeria to suppress protests against environmental damage.
While these companies deny wrongdoing, these cases reveal a growing focus on holding institutions accountable.
The Torture Industry
Torture implements are often produced in the West and sold to oppressive regimes worldwide, frequently with minimal export licensing oversight. High-tech devices like electroconvulsive stun guns and chemical agents are easily accessible online.
Amnesty International and the Omega Foundation identified over 150 manufacturers of stun guns in the USA, with additional producers in countries like Germany, Taiwan, and France. These products often pass through offshore networks to circumvent legal bans.
Evidence shows that American-produced stun devices have been found in countries with poor human rights records, such as Turkey and Saudi Arabia. American firms dominate the stun belt market, with exports to regions like Saudi Arabia and Venezuela reaching millions of dollars annually.
The European Union is not exempt. An Amnesty International report highlighted that EU-member companies supply electro-shock batons to other countries despite domestic bans.
Market for Expertise
Beyond physical tools, expertise in torture is offered by former security personnel and medical professionals from countries such as China, Israel, and the United States. The US Department of Defense admitted in 1996 that its training manuals, used in Latin America, advocated torture and other inhumane practices.
A Call for Regulation
The demand for torture tools and expertise persists. Instead of ignoring this issue, governments should consider legalizing and regulating it. Prominent criminal defense attorney Alan Dershowitz suggested that torture be legalized in extreme cases under judicial oversight. While this proposal is controversial, it highlights the need for careful scrutiny and regulation of dual-use implements.
In conclusion, as the business of torture continues to thrive, it is imperative that international communities address the trade and expertise around torture, ensuring adherence to human rights standards.
You can find the original non-AI version of this article here: The Business of Torture.
You can browse and read all the articles for free. If you want to use them and get PLR and MRR rights, you need to buy the pack. Learn more about this pack of over 100 000 MRR and PLR articles.